Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vit Kopriva vs Calin Manda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kopriva vs Manda analysis and find out who is favored!
Vit Kopriva vs Calin Manda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kopriva 1 - 0 Manda
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kopriva has won 44.15% of points on their second serve, while Manda has won 50.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kopriva, in recent form, has won 53.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Manda has won 47.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.6% and 29.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kopriva has saved 58.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Manda has saved 55.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kopriva has won 59.38% of matches played (W/L 38/ 26), with Manda winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kopriva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 246/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Manda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 195/ 157), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Kopriva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.79% of matches (W/L 27/ 16), where as Manda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 22/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kopriva winning 1 times and Manda being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kopriva winning 2 and Manda winning 0. The last match between Kopriva and Manda was at the Romania F3 (Arad), 13-06-2017, First, Clay with Vit Kopriva getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kopriva and Manda have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kopriva winning 0 times and Manda 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kopriva winning 0, and Manda 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kopriva has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.33 while Manda has played against players with an average rank of 207.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kopriva has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Manda has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kopriva has converted 47.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Manda has converted 45.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
127
Rank
111
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
812
Rank
607
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
59% (343-240)
Career Total W/L
54% (216-182)
52% (15-14)
YTD W/L
29% (2-5)
$372,445
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Vit Kopriva | Calin Manda |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:0 | 1:32:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 48% (21/44) | 67% (45/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (17/21) | 49% (22/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (12/23) | 45% (10/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (35/67) | 34% (15/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Vit Kopriva
Player
Calin Manda
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vit Kopriva | Calin Manda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (15/14) | 29% (2/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (37/33) | 29% (5/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (335/326) | 42% (66/91) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 29% (2/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 136 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:56 | 1:29:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 244.34 | 120.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1312/2073) | 66% (310/471) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (903/1312) | 59% (182/310) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (336/761) | 48% (78/161) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (92/192) | 45% (17/38) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (825/2043) | 36% (170/474) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (14/27) | 29% (2/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 0% (5/0) |
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Vit Kopriva
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Mate Valkusz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Federico Coria
73%
(
87 of
119)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
0
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
54 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Vit Kopriva
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Martin Landaluce
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Calin Manda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Calin Manda
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michel Hopp
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Calin Manda
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Sarp Agabigun
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Attila Boros
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Giotis
Player
Calin Manda
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Corentin Denolly
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michael Agwi
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
11
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kopriva Vs Manda Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Vit Kopriva
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
